Skip to content
Therapy Index US · federal registry

Therapists & Counselors in Arizona

Psychologists, clinical social workers, counselors, marriage and family therapists and psychiatrists registered with a practice address in this area.

20,407
Registered providers
180
Places with providers
23rd
National rank
of 56
13
Licence types

How density varies inside Arizona

Each bar is the number of places at that level of provider density. A long right tail means a few places carry far more providers per resident than the rest of the state.

median 18 0 65.9 providers per 10,000 residents · 79 places in Arizona
Distribution across 79 places in Arizona.

Arizona has 20,407 licensed providers with a registered practice address, across 13 licence types.

Arizona ranks 23rd of 56 states and territories by the number of registered providers in this field.

By licence type the breakdown is mental health counselor (3,295), clinical social worker (3,209), professional counselor (2,975), behavior analyst (1,826), with 9 further types making up the remainder.

The largest single group, mental health counselor, accounts for 17% of licensed providers registered here, so no one licence defines what is available. Training route and areas of focus vary more within a licence type than between them.

The three largest concentrations are Phoenix (7,105), Tucson (4,302), Scottsdale (2,457).

One caveat on reading these numbers: the registry records where a provider registered an address, not where they see clients day to day, and addresses are not always kept current. It also says nothing about whether someone is taking new clients.

How Arizona got here

new registrations per year

Each registration carries the year it was issued, so the registry doubles as a record of when this workforce grew in Arizona. A rising line means the constraint is easing; a flat one means today's shortage is likely to be next year's too.

07151.4k200820172026
New registrations per year. licensed providers in Arizona. Annual registrations in 2025 were 40% higher than in 2008. The final bar is faded because 2026 is still in progress. Starts at 2008 on purpose. The NPI system launched in 2006– 2007 and the whole profession registered at once, so those two years are an artefact of the rollout rather than a measure of anything. Including them would make the following year look like a collapse.

Who they are

self-reported to CMS

76.8% of registered licensed providers in Arizona are women. Nationally the figure varies a great deal by licence type — occupational therapy at one end, psychiatry at the other. See the national breakdown.

You can filter any city list on this site by gender. We show it because it is one of the most common things people search for and, for some kinds of work, a real need — but it is only ever a filter here, never a ranking.

Where they are registered

circle size = providers in that ZIP code
The highest-count ZIP codes for licensed providers in Arizona. Circle position is the ZIP code centroid, not a street address.

By licence type

Places in Arizona

156 of 156 have their own page so far
Place Providers Population Per 10k
Phoenix 5,292 1,665,481 31.8
Tucson 3,316 548,371 60.5
Scottsdale 1,602 243,006 65.9
Mesa 1,588 513,656 30.9
Tempe 1,066 190,571 55.9
Gilbert 926 287,285 32.2
Chandler 864 278,748 31.0
Glendale 849 260,572 32.6
Flagstaff 428 77,260 55.4
Prescott 352 48,420 72.7
Peoria 313 200,881 15.6
Surprise 277 175,304 15.8
Goodyear 218 125,359 17.4
Avondale 209 100,983 20.7
Yuma 200 105,227 19.0
Sierra Vista 176 44,907 39.2
Casa Grande 139 69,753 19.9
Sacaton 122
Queen Creek 120 89,770 13.4
Prescott Valley 100 52,423 19.1
Santa Cruz 90
Kingman 90 35,829 25.1
Apache Junction 90 45,672 19.7
Marana 84 65,523 12.8
Cottonwood 84 12,709 66.1
Buckeye 80 125,445 6.4
San Tan Valley 79
Litchfield Park 75 6,727
Fountain Hills 72 23,625 30.5
Sun City 68
Sedona 67 9,619 69.7
Martinez Lake 65
Lake Havasu City 59 59,358 9.9
Oro Valley 57 48,085 11.9
Show Low 53 12,471 42.5
Maricopa 53 78,362 6.8
Wickenburg 42 8,305 50.6
Anthem 41
Bullhead City 38 43,987 8.6
Sun City West 31
Fort Defiance 31
Cave Creek 31 5,160 60.1
Vail 30
Florence 29 25,222 11.5
Page 27 7,147 37.8
Somerton 26 14,934 17.4
Sahuarita 26 37,694 6.9
Tuba City 25
Chinle 24
Benson 24 5,532 43.4
Safford 23 10,279 22.4
Green Valley 23
Payson 22 16,693 13.2
Paradise Valley 22 12,251 18.0
Nogales 21 19,495 10.8
Parker 19 3,394 56.0
San Luis 18 42,030 4.3
Whiteriver 16
Tolleson 16 9,224 17.3
Snowflake 16 6,902 23.2
Bisbee 16 4,860 32.9
Kayenta 15
Eloy 14 19,967 7.0
Douglas 13 16,038 8.1
Camp Verde 13 12,581 10.3
Winslow 12 8,464 14.2
Globe 12 7,191 16.7
Ganado 12
Carefree 12 3,600 33.3
Dewey-Humboldt 11 4,604 23.9
Arizona City 11
Sierra Vista Southeast 10
St. Johns 10 3,336 30.0
Oracle 10
Lake Montezuma 10
Guadalupe 10 5,093 19.6
El Mirage 10 35,820 2.8
Coolidge 10 19,959 5.0
Youngtown 9 7,039 12.8
Sawmill 9
Pinetop-Lakeside 9 4,149 21.7
Holbrook 9 4,866 18.5
Citrus Park 9
San Carlos 8
Williams 7 3,473 20.2
Gold Canyon 7
Fort Mohave 7
Cornville 7
Sun Lakes 6
New River 6
Fredonia 6 1,290 46.5
Chino Valley 6 13,832 4.3
Wittmann 5
Willcox 5 3,189 15.7
Red Mesa 5
Peach Springs 5
Mohave Valley 5
Huachuca City 5 1,583 31.6
First Mesa 5
Window Rock 4
Superior 4 2,611 15.3
Sells 4
Rio Rico 4
Kleindale 4
Ajo 4
Tubac 3
Tombstone 3 1,376 21.8
Thatcher 3 5,690 5.3
Teec Nos Pos 3
Springerville 3 1,719 17.5
Sanders 3
Pinon 3
Golden Valley 3
Colorado City 3 3,484 8.6
Yarnell 2
Tonopah 2
San Manuel 2
St. David 2
Peridot 2
Miami 2 1,514 13.2
Mayer 2
Kaibito 2
Joseph City 2
Heber-Overgaard 2
Fort Apache 2
Dolan Springs 2
Dilkon 2
Young 1
Vernon 1
Tsaile 1
Tonalea 1
Supai 1
Spring Valley 1
South Tucson 1 4,452 2.2
Second Mesa 1
St. Michaels 1
Rainbow City 1
Pinedale 1
Pine 1
Parks 1
Mescal 1
Meadview 1
Littlefield 1
Flowing Wells 1
Elgin 1
Eagar 1 4,459 2.2
Dragoon 1
Concho 1
Clarkdale 1 4,806 2.1
Cibecue 1
Blue Ridge 1
Black Canyon City 1
Bitter Springs 1
Bellemont 1
Ash Fork 1
Amado 1

1 place has no per-resident figure. Those are office districts inside a larger urban area, rural towns whose practices serve a whole region, or places where most registrations share one employer's address — dividing by the resident population there produces a number that looks precise and describes nothing. The provider counts are unaffected; the test is described in the methodology.