Skip to content
Therapy Index US · federal registry

Therapists & Counselors in Idaho

Psychologists, clinical social workers, counselors, marriage and family therapists and psychiatrists registered with a practice address in this area.

8,192
Registered providers
139
Places with providers
39th
National rank
of 56
11
Licence types

How density varies inside Idaho

Each bar is the number of places at that level of provider density. A long right tail means a few places carry far more providers per resident than the rest of the state.

median 28 0 114.4 providers per 10,000 residents · 115 places in Idaho
Distribution across 115 places in Idaho.

Idaho has 8,192 licensed providers with a registered practice address, across 11 licence types.

Idaho ranks 39th of 56 states and territories by the number of registered providers in this field.

By licence type the breakdown is clinical social worker (1,755), mental health counselor (1,643), social worker (1,603), professional counselor (1,207), with 7 further types making up the remainder.

No single licence type dominates here — clinical social worker and mental health counselor are within reach of each other. For most common reasons to seek therapy, the distinction between those licences matters less than availability and cost.

The three largest concentrations are Boise City (1,675), Garden City (997), Meridian (893).

One caveat on reading these numbers: the registry records where a provider registered an address, not where they see clients day to day, and addresses are not always kept current. It also says nothing about whether someone is taking new clients.

How Idaho got here

new registrations per year

Each registration carries the year it was issued, so the registry doubles as a record of when this workforce grew in Idaho. A rising line means the constraint is easing; a flat one means today's shortage is likely to be next year's too.

0292583200820172026
New registrations per year. licensed providers in Idaho. Annual registrations in 2025 were 114% higher than in 2008. The final bar is faded because 2026 is still in progress. Starts at 2008 on purpose. The NPI system launched in 2006– 2007 and the whole profession registered at once, so those two years are an artefact of the rollout rather than a measure of anything. Including them would make the following year look like a collapse.

Who they are

self-reported to CMS

74.2% of registered licensed providers in Idaho are women. Nationally the figure varies a great deal by licence type — occupational therapy at one end, psychiatry at the other. See the national breakdown.

You can filter any city list on this site by gender. We show it because it is one of the most common things people search for and, for some kinds of work, a real need — but it is only ever a filter here, never a ranking.

Where they are registered

circle size = providers in that ZIP code
The highest-count ZIP codes for licensed providers in Idaho. Circle position is the ZIP code centroid, not a street address.

By licence type

Places in Idaho

127 of 127 have their own page so far
Place Providers Population Per 10k
Boise City 1,288 238,429 54.0
Garden City 839 13,047
Idaho Falls 675 71,785 94.0
Meridian 645 142,988 45.1
Nampa 550 120,384 45.7
Pocatello 486 58,771 82.7
Fernan Lake Village 432 163
Twin Falls 430 56,216 76.5
Caldwell 218 76,629 28.4
Robie Creek 211
Lewiston 170 34,717 49.0
Ammon 169 20,119
Rexburg 165 40,334 40.9
Sandpoint 134 10,645 125.9
Chubbuck 116 16,823 69.0
Eagle 114 34,658 32.9
Moscow 108 26,721 40.4
Post Falls 106 46,715 22.7
Dalton Gardens 102 2,496
Blackfoot 75 13,361 56.1
Hayden 74 17,363 42.6
Kuna 56 31,525 17.8
Hidden Springs 55
Burley 54 12,409 43.5
Hailey 52 10,053 51.7
Mountain Home 44 16,779 26.2
Payette 43 8,813 48.8
Emmett 40 8,900 44.9
Ketchum 33 3,643 90.6
McCall 32 4,133 77.4
Bonners Ferry 32 2,797 114.4
Driggs 27 2,403 112.4
Mountain Home AFB 26
Middleton 26 12,600 20.6
Jerome 25 13,731 18.2
Stanley 24 124
Plummer 24 1,130 212.4
Gooding 23 3,855 59.7
Fruitland 23 7,213 31.9
Parker 22 289
Orofino 21 3,259 64.4
Star 20 20,874 9.6
Salmon 20 3,286 60.9
Rigby 20 5,757 34.7
Rathdrum 19 13,227 14.4
Kellogg 16 2,456 65.1
Preston 15 6,177 24.3
Ponderay 15 2,024 74.1
Lapwai 14 1,251 111.9
Garden Valley 14
St. Maries 13 2,457 52.9
Grangeville 13 3,621 35.9
Fort Hall 13
Rupert 12 6,460 18.6
Montpelier 12 2,710 44.3
Malad City 12 2,338 51.3
Shelley 10 5,303 18.9
Kimberly 9 5,798 15.5
Weiser 7 6,249 11.2
Council 5 985 50.8
Cottonwood 5 921 54.3
Challis 5 959 52.1
Buhl 5 4,801 10.4
Yellow Pine 4
Sugar City 4 2,476 16.2
Soda Springs 4 3,165 12.6
Priest River 4 1,851 21.6
Kamiah 4 1,134 35.3
Hope 4 108
Heyburn 4 3,783 10.6
Hauser 4 915 43.7
Bellevue 4 2,597 15.4
American Falls 4 4,785 8.4
Winchester 3 363 82.6
Wallace 3 844 35.5
Victor 3 2,589 11.6
Riggins 3 396 75.8
New Plymouth 3 1,629 18.4
Homedale 3 3,138 9.6
Harrison 3 222 135.1
Donnelly 3 255 117.6
Athol 3 738 40.7
Tyhee 2
Shoshone 2 1,767 11.3
Rockford 2
Paul 2 1,722 11.6
Osburn 2 1,673 12.0
Moyie Springs 2 1,317 15.2
Iona 2 3,179 6.3
Idaho City 2 531 37.7
Hollister 2 265 75.5
Dover 2 1,164 17.2
Arco 2 918 21.8
Worley 1 248 40.3
White Bird 1 83 120.5
Troy 1 925 10.8
Tetonia 1 274 36.5
Teton 1 831 12.0
Sun Valley 1 1,776 5.6
Smelterville 1 813 12.3
Silverton 1
Potlatch 1 797 12.5
Onaway 1 218 45.9
New Meadows 1 684 14.6
Mullan 1 663 15.1
Menan 1 719 13.9
Melba 1 630 15.9
Marsing 1 1,230 8.1
Mackay 1 480 20.8
Leadore 1 99 101.0
Kootenai 1 1,091 9.2
Island Park 1 190 52.6
Hayden Lake 1 668 15.0
Hansen 1 1,109 9.0
Glenns Ferry 1 1,256 8.0
Franklin 1 1,155 8.7
Drummond 1 15
Downey 1 583 17.2
Dietrich 1 313 31.9
Culdesac 1 417 24.0
Craigmont 1 469 21.3
Castleford 1 230 43.5
Cambridge 1 357 28.0
Bovill 1 195
Ashton 1 977 10.2
Arimo 1 362
Aberdeen 1 1,852 5.4

10 places have no per-resident figure. Those are office districts inside a larger urban area, rural towns whose practices serve a whole region, or places where most registrations share one employer's address — dividing by the resident population there produces a number that looks precise and describes nothing. The provider counts are unaffected; the test is described in the methodology.