Skip to content
Therapy Index US · federal registry

Physical & Occupational Therapy in Alaska

Physical therapists and occupational therapists registered with a practice address in this area, including their board-recognised specialty areas.

1,344
Registered providers
117
Places with providers
43rd
National rank
of 56
4
Licence types

How density varies inside Alaska

Each bar is the number of places at that level of provider density. A long right tail means a few places carry far more providers per resident than the rest of the state.

median 0 0 36.3 providers per 10,000 residents · 65 places in Alaska
Distribution across 65 places in Alaska.

Alaska has 1,344 licensed therapists with a registered practice address, across 4 licence types.

Alaska ranks 43rd of 56 states and territories by the number of registered providers in this field.

By licence type the breakdown is physical therapist (847), occupational therapist (335), pediatric occupational therapist (60), orthopedic physical therapist (40), with 0 further types making up the remainder.

Just over half of the licensed therapists here — 66% — hold the same licence, physical therapist. Where one type dominates like this, the practical question is less which letters someone has than whether they work with what you are bringing to them.

The three largest concentrations are Anchorage (2,723), Coldfoot (718), Wasilla (626).

One caveat on reading these numbers: the registry records where a provider registered an address, not where they see clients day to day, and addresses are not always kept current. It also says nothing about whether someone is taking new clients.

How Alaska got here

new registrations per year

Each registration carries the year it was issued, so the registry doubles as a record of when this workforce grew in Alaska. A rising line means the constraint is easing; a flat one means today's shortage is likely to be next year's too.

04385200820172026
New registrations per year. licensed therapists in Alaska. Annual registrations in 2025 were 34% higher than in 2008. The final bar is faded because 2026 is still in progress. Starts at 2008 on purpose. The NPI system launched in 2006– 2007 and the whole profession registered at once, so those two years are an artefact of the rollout rather than a measure of anything. Including them would make the following year look like a collapse.

Who they are

self-reported to CMS

74.8% of registered licensed therapists in Alaska are women. Nationally the figure varies a great deal by licence type — occupational therapy at one end, psychiatry at the other. See the national breakdown.

You can filter any city list on this site by gender. We show it because it is one of the most common things people search for and, for some kinds of work, a real need — but it is only ever a filter here, never a ranking.

Where they are registered

circle size = providers in that ZIP code
The highest-count ZIP codes for licensed therapists in Alaska. Circle position is the ZIP code centroid, not a street address.

By licence type

Places in Alaska

42 of 42 have their own page so far
Place Providers Population Per 10k
Anchorage 533 287,155 18.6
Wasilla 158 10,556
Fairbanks 76 31,468 24.2
Crooked Creek 74
Palmer 61 6,710 90.9
Coldfoot 61
Soldotna 57 4,615 123.5
Juneau city and 54 31,609 17.1
Sitka city and 32 8,319
Kenai 32 7,924
Knik River 28
Homer 23 6,331 36.3
Point MacKenzie 22
Ketchikan 19 7,939
North Pole 16 2,477 64.6
Kodiak 15 5,281 28.4
Bethel 11 6,626
Nome 8 3,653
Gustavus 8 610
Seward 7 2,892 24.2
Utqiaġvik 6 4,640 12.9
Pleasant Valley 5
Eielson AFB 5
Petersburg 4
Kiana 4 408
Tatitlek 3
Sterling 3
Wrangell city and 2 2,007
Valdez 2 3,681 5.4
Unalaska 2 4,306 4.6
Metlakatla 2
Anchor Point 2
Willow 1
Skagway 1
Ninilchik 1
Klawock 1 720 13.9
Igiugig 1
Healy 1
Dry Creek 1
Dillingham 1 2,075
Denali Park 1
Craig 1 1,062

11 places have no per-resident figure. Those are office districts inside a larger urban area, rural towns whose practices serve a whole region, or places where most registrations share one employer's address — dividing by the resident population there produces a number that looks precise and describes nothing. The provider counts are unaffected; the test is described in the methodology.